1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
+--------------------+
| CS 140 |
| PROJECT 1: THREADS |
| DESIGN DOCUMENT |
+--------------------+
---- GROUP ----
>> Fill in the names and email addresses of your group members.
Peter Ketscher <e9651415@mail.student.tuwien.ac.at>
Karoline Knoth <e0326266@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Manuel Mausz <manuel-uni@mausz.at>
---- PRELIMINARIES ----
>> If you have any preliminary comments on your submission, notes for the
>> TAs, or extra credit, please give them here.
>> Please cite any offline or online sources you consulted while
>> preparing your submission, other than the Pintos documentation, course
>> text, lecture notes, and course staff.
Stallings, W. - Operating Systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_inversion
http://hynek.me/studies/sched_ausarbeitung.pdf
PRIORITY SCHEDULING
===================
---- DATA STRUCTURES ----
>> B1: Copy here the declaration of each new or changed `struct' or
>> `struct' member, global or static variable, `typedef', or
>> enumeration. Identify the purpose of each in 25 words or less.
>> B2: Explain the data structure used to track priority donation.
>> Use ASCII art to diagram a nested donation. (Alternately, submit a
>> .png file.)
---- ALGORITHMS ----
>> B3: How do you ensure that the highest priority thread waiting for
>> a lock, semaphore, or condition variable wakes up first?
>> B4: Describe the sequence of events when a call to lock_acquire()
>> causes a priority donation. How is nested donation handled?
>> B5: Describe the sequence of events when lock_release() is called
>> on a lock that a higher-priority thread is waiting for.
---- SYNCHRONIZATION ----
>> B6: Describe a potential race in thread_set_priority() and explain
>> how your implementation avoids it. Can you use a lock to avoid
>> this race?
---- RATIONALE ----
>> B7: Why did you choose this design? In what ways is it superior to
>> another design you considered?
SURVEY QUESTIONS
================
Answering these questions is optional, but it will help us improve the
course in future quarters. Feel free to tell us anything you
want--these questions are just to spur your thoughts. You may also
choose to respond anonymously in the course evaluations at the end of
the quarter.
>> In your opinion, was this assignment, or any one of the three problems
>> in it, too easy or too hard? Did it take too long or too little time?
>> Did you find that working on a particular part of the assignment gave
>> you greater insight into some aspect of OS design?
>> Is there some particular fact or hint we should give students in
>> future quarters to help them solve the problems? Conversely, did you
>> find any of our guidance to be misleading?
>> Do you have any suggestions for the TAs to more effectively assist
>> students, either for future quarters or the remaining projects?
>> Any other comments?
|
